An Alternating Quark Sequence Predicts Nuclear Radius from Quark Number

23 October 2020, Version 7
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

The atomic nucleus is made of protons and neutrons, each comprising a mix of 3 up or down quarks. No consensus exists for nuclear structure from among the 30+ proposed models of the atomic nucleus, although they generally agree that quarks play no role. The light nuclides of interest to nuclear fusion exist in a purgatory of uncertainty, wanting not only for structure but also for some insight into their erratic sizes. The deuterium nucleus is twice the mass of the proton but 2.5 times larger. In fact, deuterium is larger than either tritium or helium-4. The lithium-7 nucleus is larger than all of these, yet smaller than lithium-6. Here we show that an alternating quark model (AQM) predicts these erratic nuclear radii to within 99% of experimental (SD 2.5%). The distance between sequential quarks is constant and equal to the radius of the proton. Quark structures assume simple geometries. Alternating quarks predict the height of the Coulomb barrier, and demonstrate a coulombic mechanism for quantum tunneling. Through the lens of nonlinear dynamics, quarks behave as linked harmonic oscillators traveling within a basin of attraction. This satisfies the uncertainty principle while allowing localization of an average quark position. The alternating quark model thus represents an intersection between chaos theory and quantum mechanical uncertainty.

Keywords

subnucleonic structure
alternating quark sequence
proton puzzle
nuclear structure
light nuclei
RMS charge radius
nuclear radius
model of the atomic nucleus
AQS
AQS parameters
quark geometry
Ball and Stick
Close packed
spherical nucleus
quark structure
harmonic oscillator
nucleosynthesis
chaos
AQM

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplemental v3
Description
Actions
Title
Alt Quark 10'
Description
Actions
Title
AQM Directors Cut
Description
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.