Significant impact of consumable material and buffer composition for low-cell number proteomic sample preparation

01 March 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Proteomics, essential for understanding gene and cell functions, faces challenges with peptide loss due to adsorption onto vial surfaces, especially in samples with low peptide quantities. Using HeLa tryptic digested standard solutions, we demon-strate preferential adsorption of peptides, particularly hydrophobic ones, onto polypropylene (PP) vials, leading to non-uniform signal loss. This phenomenon can alter protein quantification (e.g., label-free quantification, LFQ) if no appropriat-ed data processing is applied. Our study is based on understanding this adsorption phenomenon to establish recommenda-tion for minimizing peptide loss. To address this issue, we evaluated surface material nature and buffer additives to reduce peptide-surface non-covalent binding. Here, we report that using vials made of polymer containing polar monomeric unit such as polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) or polyethylene terephthalate (PET) drastically reduces the hydrophobic peptide loss, increasing the global proteomics performances (Fourfold increase in identified peptides for the single-cell equivalent peptide content range). Additionally, the incorporation of non-ionic detergents like polyethylene oxide (PEO) and n-Dodecyl-Beta-Maltoside (DDM) at optimized concentrations (0.0001% and 0.0075% respectively) improve proteomic performances and consistency across different vial materials. Implementing these recommendations on 0.2ng/µL HeLa tryptic digest results in a tenfold increase in peptide signal. Application to True Single Cell sample preparation without specialized instru-mentation enables identification of approximately 650 proteins compared to none with classical protocols.

Keywords

Proteomics
Single-cell Proteomics
Low-cell number proteomics
Peptide loss
Peptide adsorption
Sample preparation
DDM

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting Information
Description
Supporting information of the working paper
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.