Comparing transferability in neural network approaches and linear models for machine-learning interaction potentials

22 September 2022, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.


Atomic simulations using machine learning interatomic potential (MLIP) have gained a lot of popularity owing to their accuracy in comparison to conventional empirical potentials. However, the transferability of MLIP to systems outside the training-set poses a significant challenge. Here, we compare the transferability of two MLIP approaches: i) Neural Network Potentials (NNP) and ii) Physical LassoLars Interactions Potential (PLIP), trained over a small but diverse configuration of zinc oxide polymorphs. We obtained good agreement between both MLIPs and density functional theory reference results for physical properties including bulk lattice parameters, surface energies, and vibrational density of states. However, the NNP model performed poorly when compared to the linear PLIP model for the structural optimization of nanoparticles and molecular dynamics simulation of liquid phases, which are systems outside the training-set. While generally providing less accurate results, the studied linear model appears more reliable than NNP when it comes to transferability in this specific example


Neural networks
Zinc oxide
Machine learning


Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.