On the Separation of Enantiomers by Drift Tube Ion Mobility Spectrometry

25 January 2022, Version 2
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Racemic mixtures of twelve common α-amino acids and three chiral drugs were tested for the separation of their enantiomers by drift tube ion mobility spectrometry (IMS)-quadrupole mass spectrometry (QMS) by introducing chiral selectors into the buffer gas of the IMS instrument. (R)-α-(trifluoromethyl) benzyl alcohol, (L)-ethyl lactate, methyl (S)-2-chloropropionate, and the R and S enantiomers of 2-butanol and 1-phenyl ethanol were evaluated as chiral selectors. Experimental conditions were varied during the tests, including buffer gas temperature, concentration and type of chiral selectors, analyte concentration, electrospray (ESI) voltage, ESI solvent pH, and buffer gas flow rate. The individual enantiomers yielded the same drift times and the racemic mixtures could not be separated as opposed to a previous report (Dwivedi et al. Anal. Chem. 2006, 78, 8200). Energy calculations of the chiral selector –ion interactions showed that these separations are unlikely using 2-butanol as a chiral selector but they might be theoretically feasible depending on the chiral selector nature and the type of enantiomers. Several plausible explanations for not succeeding were analyzed. A critical review of previously claimed enantiomer separations by drift-tube IMS-MS is presented and recommendations for potential enantiomer separations by IMS are proposed.

Keywords

enantiomer separation
Ion mobility spectrometry
racemic mixtures
Theoretical CalculationsAb initio
2-butanol

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
On the separation of enantiomers by IMS ChemRxiv
Description
Fig.S1. ESI-IMS-MS spectrometer. Fig.S2. Chiral analytes and selectors Fig.S3. IMS spectra of racemic mixtures or enantiomers. Fig.S4. L-valinol IMS spectrum showing resolution . Fig.S5. phenylalanine:2-butanol interaction. Fig.S6-S8. Structures of chiral cations and complexes with 2-butanol. Fig.S9. Graphical explanation of Table3. Fig.S10. Mass spectra showing extensive cluster formation at high (S)-2-butanol concentrations. TableS1. Review of seven studies cited by Nagy et al.6 about enantioseparations. TableS2. Resolving power of IMS instrument. TableS3. ΔK0’ and ΔK0,c: values for experiments from reference 12. TableS4. Complete version of Table3 TableS5. Chiral experiments with D and L phenylalanine. TableS6. Drift times of valine enantiomers over 8-hr using (S)-2-butanol TableS7. chiral selector concentration and mobilities of valinol enantiomers at 125, 200°C APPENDIX1. Stability of mobilities of valine enantiomers with time APPENDIX2. Chiral selector concentration and enantioseparation APPENDIX3. Buffer gas temperature and valinol enantioseparation APPENDIX4. Analyte concentration and enantioseparation APPENDIX5. Claimed fluoxetine enantioseparation APPENDIX6. Recommendations for potential enantioseparation
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.