Amide-to-ester substitution as a strategy for optimizing PROTAC permeability and cellular activity

05 July 2021, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.


Bifunctional PROTAC degraders belong to "beyond Rule of 5" chemical space, and criteria for predicting their drug-like properties are underdeveloped. PROTAC components are often combined via late-stage amide couplings, due to the reliability and robustness of amide bond formation. Amides, however, can give rise to low cellular permeability and poor ADME properties. We hypothesized that a bioisosteric replacement of an amide with a less polar ester could lead to improvements in both physicochemical properties and bioactivity. Using a library of model compounds, bearing either amides or esters at various linker-warhead junctions, we identify parameters for optimal compound lipophilicity and permeability. We next applied these learnings to design a set of novel amide-to-ester substituted, VHL-based BET degraders with increased permeability. Our ester-PROTACs remarkably retained intracellular stability, were overall more potent degraders than their amide counterparts and showed an earlier onset of the hook effect. These enhanced cellular features were found to be driven by greater cell permeability rather than improvements in ternary complex formation. This largely unexplored amide-to-ester substitution therefore provides a simple and practical strategy to enhance PROTAC permeability and degradation performance. Such approach could prove equally beneficial to other classes of beyond Ro5 molecules. 


Beyond Rule of Five
Ternary complexes
Hook effect
Protein Degradation
BET degraders

Supplementary materials

Supporting Information
Supporting Information containing Supplementary Tables 1-4, Supplementary Figures 1-4, Supplementary Experimental Methods, and NMR and LC/MS spectra for new compounds


Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.