Cambridge Open Engage home
What is Cambridge Open Engage?
How to Submit
Browse
About
News [opens in a new tab]

Identification of Ru/Ceria Among Single Atom Ceria Catalysts as a Stable and Superior Material for Abatement of Diesel and Gasoline Engine Pollutants

23 July 2020, Version 1
Working Paper
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Atomically dispersed transition metals (Ru, Pd and Pt) have been prepared on CeO2 and evaluated for NOx/CO abatement applications for diesel and gasoline engines, such as low temperature passive NOx adsorption (PNA), NO and CO oxidation, and three-way-catalysis (TWC). 0.5 wt% Ru/CeO2 catalyst (Ru is ~27 and ~7 times cheaper than Rh and Pd) shows remarkable PNA performance, better than 1 wt% Pd/Zeolite: it achieves 100% removal of NOx during vehicle cold start. FTIR measurements reveal the formation of stable Ru(NO) complexes as well spill-over of NO to CeO2 surface via the Ru-O-Ce shuttle, explaining high NO storage. Notably, Ru/ceria survives hydrothermal aging at 750 ⁰C without loss of PNA capacity. It is also a robust NO oxidation catalyst, considerably more active than Pt or Pd/CeO2. Expanding the repertoire of Ru/CeO2 catalytic applications, we further find 0.1 and 0.5 wt% Ru/CeO2 to be excellent TWC catalysts, rivaling best single-atom Rh supported materials. Our study pushes the frontier of precious metal atom economy for environmental catalysis from uber expensive Rh/Pd/Pt to more sustainable cheaper Ru and highlights the utility of single-atom catalysts for industrially relevant applications.

Keywords

diesel and gasoline engine pollution abatement
low temperature passive NOx adsorber
three way catalyst
NO oxidation catalyst
CO oxidation catalyst
single atom heterogeneous ceria catalsysts
palladium platinum ruthenium Pd Pt Ru on ceria CeO2
Ruthenium ceria as a superior catalyst

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.

Version History

Jul 23, 2020 Version 1

Version Notes

Version 1.0

Metrics

7,868
3,237
0
Views
Downloads
Citations

License

CC logo
CC
BY logo
BY
NC logo
NC
ND logo
ND
The content is available under CC BY NC ND 4.0 [opens in a new tab]

DOI

10.26434/chemrxiv.12692264.v1
D O I: 10.26434/chemrxiv.12692264.v1 [opens in a new tab]

Funding

The research at PNNL was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Vehicle Technology Office. Experiments were conducted in the Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory (EMSL), a national scientific user facility sponsored by the Department of Energy’s Office of Biological and Environmental Research at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). PNNL is a multi-program national laboratory operated for the DOE by Battelle Memorial Institute under Contract DE-AC06-76RL01830. We acknowledge the support of CLEERS (Crosscut Lean Exhaust Emissions Reduction Simulations). CLEERS is an initiative funded by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Vehicle Technologies Office to support the development of accurate tools for use in the design, calibration, and control of next generation engine/emissions control systems that maximize efficiency while complying with emissions regulations.

Author’s competing interest statement

The authors filed for a patent

Share