Sorption Is Not Biocatalysis: Reassessing Michaelis–Menten Kinetics and Active Site Models on Bulk Iron Oxides

25 June 2025, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Phosphorus plays a central role in both biological and geochemical systems, governed by the unique combination of thermodynamic stability and kinetic lability in phosphate ester bonds. Understanding phosphate hydrolysis at inorganic surfaces is crucial not only for phosphorus chemistry but also for clarifying how catalytic function emerges across different material scales. Iron oxide nanomaterials have been shown to promote abiotic phosphate ester hydrolysis with enzyme-like activity, exhibiting reproducible turnover and saturable kinetics under sorption-limited conditions. Recent studies have extended these interpretations to bulk mineral phases such as goethite and ferrihydrite from soil, applying Michaelis–Menten kinetics to describe reaction rates. However, these bulk systems lack structurally defined active sites and do not meet the mechanistic criteria required for biocatalytic modeling. Crucially, their experimental designs do not decouple hydrolysis from sorption, and product detection remains incomplete—particularly for sorbed inorganic phosphate and evolving organophosphorus intermediates, as assessed by phosphorus K-edge X-ray absorption spectroscopy. Calculated kinetic parameters such as kcₐₜ rely on speculative assumptions about active site densities, leading to model-fitting artifacts rather than mechanistic insight. We argue that the observed reactivity in bulk systems arises from surface-mediated transformations, not true biocatalysis. More broadly, this Perspective challenges the assumption that biocatalytic behavior at the nanoscale can be linearly extrapolated to bulk analogues. By distinguishing nanoscale-specific features—such as structural disorder, redox dynamics, and localized electron transport—from bulk-phase surface chemistry, we propose a more rigorous framework for interpreting phosphorus reactivity and catalysis across material scales.

Keywords

Phosphate ester hydrolysis
Iron oxides
Nanocatalysts
Michaelis–Menten kinetics
Surface-mediated reactivity
Active site density
Sorption vs catalysis
Nano-to-bulk transition

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.