Techno-economic assessment of non-aqueous CO2 reduction

21 June 2025, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Most research on low-temperature CO2 electrolysis has focused on aqueous electrolytes, primarily because non-aqueous systems require high cell voltages. However, CO2R in aqueous electrolytes competes with hydrogen evolution and requires many electron transfers to produce C2+ molecules, challenges that can be suppressed in non-aqueous electrolytes. In this forward-looking techno-economic assessment, we model the product cost for non-aqueous CO2R. We show that CO2R to oxalic acid – a 2-electron C2 product formed in non-aqueous electrolytes – is surprisingly affordable, although producing CO is more expensive in non-aqueous systems. Using parameters extracted from the largest collection of literature data on CO2R in aprotic non-aqueous electrolytes, we find that oxalic acid would cost $2.87/kg in a small-scale process. A commercial-scale plant would lower the product cost to $1.56/kg, approaching current market prices of $0.7 to $2.5/kg. Capital cost for this process is dominated by product separation, while operating costs mostly arise from stack replacement and electricity to drive the high required cell voltage. This assessment shows that non-aqueous CO2R could be a promising pathway for scale-up that has been largely overlooked compared to aqueous CO2 electrolysis, offering new opportunities like electrolyte design to lower product costs. We therefore present a technical roadmap to make non-aqueous CO2R to oxalic acid competitive with market prices.

Keywords

Techno-economics
Non-aqueous

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplementary Information
Description
Detailed mass balance calculations, Figures S1 – S14, and Tables S1 – S7.
Actions
Title
Supplementary Workbook S1
Description
Excel file containing parameters for techno-economic assessment of non-aqueous CO2R.
Actions
Title
Supplementary Workbook S2
Description
Excel file containing literature review data corresponding to Figure 1 and Figure S1.
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.