Control of Copper Morphology on TaN through Surface Point Defects

11 June 2025, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

The downscaling of semiconductor devices makes deposition of copper interconnects challenging. Copper forms non-conductive islands on diffusion barriers such as TaN and this effect worsens as the length scales move towards the few-nm. Adding a liner or glue layer, doping the substrate to achieve better adhesion or replacing Cu are being investigated to overcome this challenge. Introducing surface defects, e.g. surface point defects or dopants, can modify the metal nucleation and promote growth of targeted morphologies. We use density functional theory (DFT) and ab initio molecular dynamics (aiMD) to model surface point defects in TaN and explore how these surface defects can control the adsorption and morphology preference of deposited Cu nanostructures. Formation of nitrogen vacancies is favourable, especially in a hydrogen ambient, with small energy cost, indicating possible control of defects through control of atmosphere during processing. Combining adsorption studies of single atoms and small metal clusters with aiMD simulations of larger metal structures, we show how higher concentrations of surface nitrogen vacancies may limit undesired 3D growth, while a low concentration of vacancies has a negligible effect, promoting 3D island morphology. These results show that morphology control by surface defects is a way to promote target metal morphology

Keywords

Metal morphology
Surface defects
DFT
ab initio MD

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting Information
Description
Supporting information document contains the following: 1. Density of states for pristine and defect TaN (Figure S1) 2. Formation energy for tantalum vacancies (Table S1). 3. Structures of Cu tetramer clusters at N vacancies on TaN (Figure S2). 4. Cu binding energy after relaxation and aiMD simulations (Table S2). 5. Total energy plot from 15 ps aiMD simulations (Figure S3). 6. Formal charge distribution of Cu on defect TaN (Figure S4 & Table S3).
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.