CYCLO70: A New Challenging Pericyclic Benchmarking Set for Kinetics and Thermochemistry Evaluation

06 June 2025, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Here, a new challenging benchmarking dataset for cycloaddition reactions, CYCLO70, is presented and analyzed. CYCL70 has been generated with the specific aim of being representative of the most challenging regions of the chemical reaction space surrounding Diels-Alder, dipolar cycloadditions, and (sigmatropic) rearrangement reactions with the help of an active learning approach. Testing 93 different functionals, spanning from spin-local density approximation to the most recent double-hybrid functionals, we observe that the errors on CYCLO70 are significantly bigger than those on the cycloaddition subset of BH9, the most popular benchmarking dataset for this reaction class. Furthermore, we observe that only one functional, the range-separated hybrid $\omega$B97M-V, reaches the desirable "chemical accuracy" to model barrier heights and reaction energies; among the double hybrids, PBE-QIDH performs best, and among the hybrids, it is M06-2X and r$^2$SCAN50 that exhibit the lowest errors. Lastly, we perform a principal component analysis for the errors across the dataset, and demonstrate not only that the errors across different functional approximations correlate to a significant extent (the first two components explain 98\% of the variance), but we also observe that functionals belonging to the same rung of Jacob's ladder cluster together in the constructed two dimensional plot.

Keywords

benchmarking
Bayesian optimization
Density Functional Theory
cycloaddition reactions

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting Information
Description
Supplementary statistics for all the assessed methods, reference energies, complementary plots, and silhouette scores.
Actions

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.