Practical Guidelines for Optimising Free Energy Calculations Using Thermodynamic Integration

02 June 2025, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Free energy calculations have become valuable in structure-based drug design, but their accuracy and reliability remain significant challenges. Here, we present an automated workflow for free energy estimation built with AMBER20, alchemlyb, and an open-source cycle closure algorithm. Evaluated on 178 perturbations across four datasets, the short sub-nanosecond simulations performed comparably or better than prior studies for the MCL1, BACE, and CDK2 datasets, while the TYK2 dataset required a longer equilibration time (∼ 2 ns). Perturbations with |ΔΔG| > 2.0 kcal/mol exhibited higher errors, suggesting such perturbations are unreliable, hence providing a practical guideline for improving thermodynamic integration simulations.

Keywords

thermodynamic integration
free energy perturbation
AMBER
cycle closure

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplementary tables
Description
Supplementary tables
Actions
Title
Spreadsheets with free energies
Description
ΔΔG and ΔG values
Actions
Title
Perturbation maps
Description
Perturbation maps
Actions

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.