Fluorinated twists: A pathway to a stable Pd8L16 square antiprism

19 May 2025, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Within the extensive family of PdnL2n metal-organic cages, some structures are much easier to access than others. Ligands are generally constructed from planar aromatic linkers. Whilst small structures (Pd2L4 to Pd6L12) and large pseudospherical structures (≥Pd12L24) can be readily obtained from these flat aryl-based ligands, strategies to intermediate-sized structures have remained elusive as the required angle between metal-ligand coordination vectors (90°-120°) is hard to construct from the common toolkit of organic molecules. Herein, we report the Pd8L16 square antiprism as a new addition to the PdnL2n family; a structure shown as thermodynamically stable both in solution and the solid state for the first time. The ligand achieves close to the ideal angle of 105.1° needed for the square antiprism through incorporation of a perfluorobiphenyl backbone. The substantial dihedral twist induced by the fluorines diverges the coordination vectors compared to non-fluorous examples, whilst crucially maintaining ligand rigidity to avoid formation of mixtures of structures – a strategy we believe will have widespread applications in (metallo)supramolecular chemistry.

Keywords

Metal-organic cage
square antiprism
dihedral angle
perfluoro
imidazole

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplementary information
Description
A PDF file containing experimental procedures, NMR spectra (1H, COSY, DOSY, 13C, 19F), high-resolution ESI-MS, and analysis of the SCXRD data. Single crystal data has been submitted to the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre (CCDC), with deposit numbers: cage 1 (2450736), cage 2 (2450737), cage 3 (2450738), ligand L1 (2450739), ligand L2 (2450740), and ligand L3 (2450741).
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.