Characterizing Chemical Toxicity for Life Cycle Assessment Using Machine Learning Models Based on Environmental Footprint – Illustrated importance through a textile case study

19 May 2025, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

To support the integration of emerging chemicals into life cycle assessment (LCA), we developed a machine learning (ML) workflow to predict characterization factors (CFs) for both human toxicity and ecotoxicity, aligned with the EU Environmental Footprint (EF) methodology. Using extended chemicals from EF version 3 database and molecular descripotrs derived from SMILES (Simplified Molecular-Input Line-Entry System) strings, we trained and evaluated three ML models: extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), gaussian process (GP) regression, and deep neural networks (NN). A clustering step was used to guide model selection for new compounds. XGBoost consistently performed best, achieving R² values up to 0.65 and 0.61 for ecotoxicity and human toxicity (seas water, continent). New chemicals should first be assigned to clusters for which the best tailored ML model is then selected. An LCA case study in the textile sector illustrates the importance of CF prediction, as the total human toxicity score is at least 4 orders of magnitudes higher when including predicted CFs that were originally missing. Overall, this end-to-end ML approach offers a robust and efficient alternative to traditional methods, enabling immediate integration of predicted CFs into LCA studies, which could facilitate safe and sustainable by design implementation.

Keywords

Machine Learning
Characterization Factors
Life Cycle Assessment
Toxicity
Safe and Sustainable by Design
End-to-End Prediction
SMILES

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Characterizing Chemical Toxicity for Life Cycle Assessment Using Machine Learning Models Based on Environmental Footprint – Illustrated importance through a textile case study
Description
Analysis of chemical classes in EF (v3) and USEtox (v2) using ClassyFire; Gaussian mixture model equation and implementation; explanation of ML models and their implementation; Feature importance via SHAP analysis; BIC scores under four different covariance assumptions and components number; PCA visualization of different clusters; features importance for clustering; superclass of chemicals in each clusters based on ClassyFire; case study of life cycle assessment in textile sector, comparing toxicity results with or without the predicted CFs.
Actions
Title
trainding data and cluster results
Description
Curated data for training, descriptors definition, and cluster specific R2 results
Actions
Title
Characterization factors for case study
Description
Characterization factors used in the case study, predicted or provided directly from Environmental footprint v3
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.