Extrapolating Local Coupled Cluster Calculations Toward CCSD(T)/CBS Binding Energies of Atmospheric Molecular Clusters

13 May 2025, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Aerosols are the largest source of uncertainty in modern global radiative forcing modeling. Atmospheric molecular clusters are important intermediates in atmospheric new particle formation (NPF). The evaporation rate of clusters can be calculated using quantum chemical methods, with an exponential dependence on the free energy. Hence, for simulating accurate NPF rates, high-accuracy calculations are needed. We have constructed a versatile benchmark set 218 conformers of atmospheric molecular dimer clusters consisting of sulfuric acid (SA), formic acid (FA), nitric acid (NA), methanesulfonic acid (MSA), water (W), ammonia (AM), methylamine (MA), dimethylamine (DMA), trimethylamine (TMA), and ethylenediamine (EDA) molecules. Using this testset, we benchmark the local coupled cluster methods, DLPNO- CCSD(T0 ) and LNO-CCSD(T), using different basis sets and locality settings, and test extrapolation procedures to the complete basis set (CBS), local approximation free (LAF), and complete PNO space (CPS) limits. The extrapolations are tested against the binding energies of high-level CCSD(F12*)(T+)/cc-pVTZ-F12 reference calculations. We find that the LNO-CCSD(T) methods offer a better accuracy-to-cost ratio for atmospheric molecular clusters than the usually employed DLPNO-CCSD(T0 ) method. Furthermore, the CBS limit extrapolation using the aug-cc-pVTZ and aug- cc-pVQZ basis sets should be readily attainable for the LNO-CCSD(T) method on the usually studied cluster sizes (4–8 monomers). Simulating the new particle formation rate of the (SA)1−4 (AM)1−4 and (SA)1−4 (DMA)1−4 systems using the Atmospheric Cluster Dynamics Code , we find an increased sensi- tivity to the locality settings for larger clusters, but the basis set error is still the most dominant. Hence, simulated cluster formation rates would benefit from doing LAF extrapolation. Finally, we illustrate the calculations of LNO-CCSD(T)/CBS binding energies of a large (SA)15 (TMA)15 cluster (300 atoms). Hence, the application of LNO-CCSD(T) allows for significantly more accurate binding energies of much larger clusters than previously possible.

Keywords

Molecular clusters
Aerosols
New particle formation

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting information
Description
PDF with the supporting information.
Actions
Title
Spreadsheet of the electronic energies of the dimers.
Description
Contains the energies for the benchmark used in Figures 1-4 and SI 1-2. All values are in Hartree. basename refers to the structurefile name in benchmark_structures.zip F12_VTZ_FULL is the CCSD(F12*)(T+)/cc-pVTZ-F12 reference values. DLPNO is DLPNO-CCSD(T) and LNO is LNO-CCSD(T). "SCF" is the SCF energy, "CORR" is the correlation energy, and "FULL" is the total electronic energy.
Actions
Title
Zip file of xyz structures
Description
The xyz structures of the dimer test set.
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.