Establishing the Compatibility of Anolytes and Catholytes in Dual Electrolyte Solid-State Batteries

13 May 2025, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

In the pursuit of long-lasting, high-energy density solid-state batteries, dual solid electrolyte designs offer a unique path toward stabilizing the electrode-electrolyte in- terfaces in the presence of a high-voltage positive electrode and a low-voltage negative electrode. However, electrolyte pairings that form a stable interface under battery operating conditions must be identified. In this study, we used the onset reaction tem- perature as a proxy to assess the chemical compatibility between a chloride (Li2ZrCl6 (LZC))catholyte(ahighoxidativestabilityelectrolyte)andtwocommonthiophosphate (Li3PS4 (LPS) and Li6PS5Cl (LPSC)) anolytes (high reductive stability electrolytes). While LPS reacts with LZC starting at 90°C, the LZC–LPSC pairing appears sta- ble up to 260°C. When heated to 300°C, the two pairings decompose to form LiCl, a layered LixZryP2S6 phase, ZrS2, ZrS3, S8, as well as γ−Li3PS4 for the LZC–LPSC pairing. Consistent with those findings, first-principles calculations show that neither pairing is thermodynamically stable. However, a higher decomposition energy is pre- dicted for the LZC–LPSC combination, suggesting that it is kinetically stabilized up to 260°C. The LZC–LPSC interface is conductive to Li-ions, with an extremely low resis- tance (4.2 Ω cm−2). Furthermore, cells comprising an LZC–LPSC bilayer separating a LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2 positive electrode and Li-In negative electrode exhibit exception- ally stable performance, with 90.0 % and 83.8 % of their initial capacity retained after 200 and 500 cycles, respectively. These findings allow us to propose several criteria for designing stable electrified interfaces for a wide range of electrochemical devices.

Keywords

Solid-state batteries
Interfaces
Reactivity
Dual electrolyte
Ion transport

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplementary Information for Establishing the Compatibility of Anolytes and Catholytes in Dual Electrolyte Solid-State Batteries
Description
Experimental Methods. Char- acterization of LIC–LPSC reactivity. Rietveld refinement of in situ synchrotron diffraction patterns obtained on mixed LZC–LPSC samples during heating. Characterization of LZC, LPS, and LPSC solid electrolytes. Identification of the LixZryP2S6 decomposition phase. Ra- man spectra of LZC–LPS and LZC–LPSC HT-300 ampules. Additional characterization of LZC–LPS mixed samples. Additional characterization of LZC–LPSC mixed samples. Possi- ble sources of discrepancy between experimentally-observed and computationally-predicted chemical reactivity. Pulsed-field gradient NMR data acquisition and analysis. Variable temperature 6Li solid-state NMR on LZC–LPSC mixed powder sample. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy on LZC, LPSC, and LZC– LPSC pellets. Additional electrochemi- cal testing results from dual-electrolyte LZC–LPSC solid-state batteries.
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.