Abstract
We compared the solvent-responsivity of block and statistical copolymer brushes of varied solvophobic-to-solvophilic ratios by measuring brush swelling in two sol- vents of varying polarity. We first copolymerized 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DMA) and 2-(diisopropylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DiPA) and tuned DMA:DiPA ratios in block and statistical copolymer brushes. Then, we selectively quaternized DMA to enlarge solvophilicity differences between DMA and DiPA; water but not isopropanol is a good solvent for qDMA whereas DiPA exhibits the opposite solvation preference. In water, increasing DiPA incorporation depressed brush swelling for both block and 1 statistical copolymer brushes. However, in isopropanol, swelling responses diverged; block copolymer brushes swelled between 9 and 37% less than compositionally equiv- alent statistical copolymer brushes. Additionally, we investigated the feasibility of de- ploying our polymer brushes in cell-interfacing applications by evaluating cytocom- patibility. We established that the spatial distribution—and not just the relative abundance of solvophobic and solvophilic repeat units—governs polymer brushes’ solvent responsivity.
Supplementary materials
Title
SI solvent responsive
Description
Additional characterization data
Actions