Evaluating and Interpreting the Predictive Power of Features in Battery Lifetime Prediction

09 April 2025, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Data-driven early prediction of lithium-ion battery lifetime accelerates performance evaluation and management, yet model interpretability remains limited. We evaluate the predictive power of physics-based features using an aging dataset where a single cycling protocol is used and variability is induced by varying the formation protocols. By forward-simulating the open-circuit voltage and resistance-based degradation modes, features generated using early cycles are linked to specific degradation mechanisms. In particular, we find that low-rate features generated from periodic diagnostic cycles are more predictive because they capture the main degradation mode in the dataset, lithium inventory loss. Our findings enhance model interpretability and highlight the necessity of carefully designed diagnostic cycles that capture various degradation behaviors for accurate battery cycle life prediction.

Keywords

model interpretability
battery degradation
battery lifetime prediction

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.