Investigating fine particulate matter transport in a multi-story house using low-cost sensor measurements and different modeling approaches

06 March 2025, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

This work investigates the transport of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) in a multi-story test house using cooking emissions as a point source. The test house was instrumented with 13 PM2.5 monitors, and the particle sources included pan cooking and air frying, as well as ambient PM2.5 penetration during periods of no indoor activity. In the absence of indoor sources, we observed about 10 % of ambient PM2.5 concentrations penetrating indoors with a time lag of 1 h. Similar peak PM2.5 concentrations were observed for pan frying and air frying of the same food ingredients. A cross-correlation analysis showed that it took 2 to 4 min for kitchen peak concentrations to reach other sensors on the first floor and about 8 min to reach the second floor. PM2.5 concentrations were heterogeneous on the first floor, with non-kitchen areas peaking at 45 % ± 9 % of kitchen levels. Second-floor concentrations were more homogeneous, peaking at 18 % ± 2 % of kitchen levels. Using a typical occupancy scenario, the highest estimated personal PM2.5 exposure (44 %) was experienced in the kitchen/dining area, which accounted for 9 % of the time spent at home. We used three modeling approaches to analyze particle transport throughout the house, with increasing input requirements: a multi-box model, an empirical model, and the NIST CONTAM model. All models predicted time integrated PM2.5 concentrations on the 1st and 2nd floors, with R2 between 0.57 and 0.82 and RMSE from 6 µg m-3 to 11 µg m-3.

Keywords

Indoor air quality
indoor transport
aerosols
indoor particles
PM2.5
modeling
infiltration

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplemental Information for: Investigating fine particulate matter transport in a multi-story house using low-cost sensor measurements and different modeling approaches
Description
Additional figures, tables, and text describing the indoor environmental conditions during the study period, sensor locations, modeling conditions, equations, and assumptions, and supplementary result figures.
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.