Abstract
A huge issue in computational electrochemistry is that different modeling approaches, used to study electron transfer reactions, give different results that cannot easily be reconciled with each other. One discrepancy is their handling of interface charging. I study charging of electrolyte-Cu(111) interfaces with electrons and cations (or positive continuum charge) and observe that the charging energy depends strongly on the electrolyte model. When the electrolyte is a film containing water, there is a significant stabilization of the energy with more negative potential. This is in contrast to the charging of an interface with implicit solvent, where charge repulsion result in low stabilization of the energy with more negative potential. This could give the erroneous impression that charging can be ignored in electrochemistry modeling. I further consider constant potential CO2 adsorption to highlight the importance of charging and using an electrolyte model with water molecules, and show that other modeling approaches gives significantly different CO2 adsorption energies.
Supplementary materials
Title
Electronic Supplementary Information
Description
Internal energies and simulation temperatures during the simulated annealing and relative energies and workfunctions of the chosen and fully optimized structures for each interface with an electrolyte film in contact with the Cu(111) surface. Location, and influence thereof, of the Jellium region in the implicit charging simulations. Importance of using ghost atoms to remove continuum solvent from the Cu(111) surface in simulations containing an electrolyte film. Continuum charging energies for the implicit solvent-Pt(111) interface using VASPsol.
Actions
Supplementary weblinks
Title
Data availability
Description
The DFT calculations and python scripts, which form the basis of this study, are accessible online at
https://nano.ku.dk/english/research/theoretical-electrocatalysis/katladb/impact-of-charging.
Actions
View