Abstract
Physics-based docking methods have long been the cornerstone of structure-based virtual screening (VS). However, the emergence of machine learning (ML)-based docking approaches has opened up new possibilities for enhancing VS technologies. In this study, we explore the integration of DiffDock-L, a leading ML-based pose sampling method, into VS workflows by combining it with the well-established Vina and Gnina scoring functions. We assess this integrated approach in terms of its VS effectiveness, pose sampling quality, and complementarity to traditional physics-based docking methods, such as AutoDock Vina. Our findings from the DUDEZ benchmark dataset show that DiffDock-L performs competitively in both VS performance and pose sampling in cross-docking settings. In most cases, it generates physically plausible and biologically relevant poses, establishing itself as a viable alternative to physics-based docking algorithms. Additionally, we found that the choice of scoring function significantly influences VS success.
Supplementary materials
Title
Supporting Information
Description
Contains additional details on parameters used in executing the docking programs, statistics of the processed molecules, correlation analyses for docking scores, validity and plausibility analyses of docking poses, and statistics on protein-ligand interaction profiles of the docking poses and reference ligands for individual targets (PDF).
Actions