Identification of metal-organic frameworks for near practical energy limit CO2 capture from wet flue gases: an integrated atomistic and process simulation screening of experimental MOFs

29 January 2025, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Metal-organic framework (MOF) materials have attracted significant attention as solid sorbents for low energy CO2 capture with adsorption-based gas separation processes. In this work, an integrated screening workflow combining a series of atomistic and process simulations was applied to identify promising MOFs for a 4-step pressure-vacuum swing adsorption (P/VSA) process at three different CO2 flue gas compositions (6%, 15% and 35%). Starting from 55,818 unique experimentally characterized MOFs, ~19k porous MOFs were investigated via atomistic grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulations and process optimizations. Thousands of MOFs were identified for each of the CO2 compositions tested that could achieve within 4% of the practical energy limit of dry CO2 capture for the P/VSA process while still meeting the 95% CO2 purity and 90% recovery constraints. From this pool, 526, 536 and 1,527 MOFs were subjected to the multi-component (CO2/N2/H2O) GCMC simulations at 40% relative humidity. Based on these simulations, hundreds of MOFs were identified at each CO2 composition that could retain 90% of their CO2 capture at this humidity while also adsorbing a minimal amount of water. A geometric analysis of these high performing materials revealed that narrow, straight 1D-channels, were a common structural motif for low energy wet flue gas CO2 capture with P/VSA.

Keywords

CO2 Capture
Metal Organic Frameworks
Pressure Swing Adsorption
process simulations
atomistic simulation

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.