Which modern AI methods provide accurate predictions of toxicological endpoints? Analysis of Tox24 challenge results.

10 January 2025, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

The Tox24 challenge was designed to evaluate the progress that has been made in computational method development for the prediction of in vitro activity since the Tox21 challenge. In this challenge, participants were tasked with developing models to predict chemical binding to transthyretin (TTR), a serum binding protein, based on chemical structure. The analyzed dataset included chemicals that were screened in a competitive binding assay designed to measure the reduction in fluorescence due to displacement of 8-anilino-1-naphthalenesulfonic acid ammonium salt (ANSA) from TTR. The data were randomly split into a training set of 1012 compounds, a leaderboard set of 200, and a blind set of 300. This article provides an overview of the Tox24 Challenge and some of the models developed by the participating teams. Some of the approaches taken by winning teams included use of mixtures, enumerating tautomers, data cleaning. Many of the teams used consensus models. Overall, there has been significant progress in the development of machine learning tools since the Tox21 Challenge.

Keywords

machine learning
(Q)SAR

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.