Abstract
From environmental impact statements to regulatory impact assessments, there are a variety of
analyses in the United States that measure sustainability to inform federal, state, and/or local
decision-making. Without procedures to ensure meaningful inclusion of Indigenous Knowledge
and respect for Indigenous sovereignty, we find that many assessments currently jeopardize the
discovery and development of truly sustainable solutions. Specifically, we evaluate how 17
different kinds of assessments (mis)align with Anishinaabe Gikendaasowin (Knowledge) on
Asemaa, Ma’iingan, and the Seventh Fire prophecy – teachings that guide sustainable relationships
between Physical, Plant, Animal, and Human Worlds. Our analysis is rooted in Anishinology and
Two-Eyed Seeing, practices that together guide our approach to bridging Anishinaabe
Gikendaasowin and Western scientific Knowledge and elucidate a more robust understanding of
sustainability. “Sustainability” stands at a crossroads; ultimately, this analysis provides guidance
for improving assessment protocols to ensure that current sustainability efforts do not repeat
injustices of the past.
Supplementary materials
Title
Supporting Information
Description
The Supporting Information contains the Assessment Protocol Analysis, the Asemaa Teachings on Consent, the Assessment Focus, and the Indirect Connections between Assessments.
Actions