Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are contaminants of increasing concern, with over seven million compounds currently inventoried in the PubChem PFAS Tree. Recently, ion mobility spectrometry has been combined with liquid chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry (LC-IMS-HRMS) to assess PFAS. Interestingly, using negative electrospray ionization, per-fluoroalkyl carboxylic acids (PFCAs) form homodimers ([2M-H]-), a phenomenon observed with trapped, traveling wave, and drift-tube IMS. In addition to the limited research on their effect on analytical performance, there is little information on the conformations these dimers can adopt. This study aimed to propose most probable conformations for PFCA dimers. Based on qualitative analysis of how collision cross section (CCS) values change with the mass-to-charge ratio (m/z) of PFCA ions, the PFCA dimers were hypothesized to likely adopt a V-shaped structure. To support this assumption, in silico geometry optimizations were performed to generate a set of conformers for each possible dimer. A CCS value was then calculated for each conformer using the trajectory method with Lennard-Jones and ion-quadrupole potentials. Among these conformers, at least one of the ten lowest-energy conformers identified for each dimer exhibited theoretical CCS values within a ±2% error margin compared to the experimental data, qualifying them as plausible structures for the dimers. Our findings revealed that the fluorinated alkyl chains in the dimers are close to each other due to a combination of C-F⸱⸱⸱O=C and C-F⸱⸱⸱F-C stabilizing interactions. These findings, together with supplementary investigations involving environmentally relevant cations, may offer valuable insights into the interactions and environmental behavior of PFAS.
Supplementary materials
Title
Supplementary information
Description
Additional DTIM, TIMS and TWIMS settings; CCS calibration procedure; Experimental CCS values; Percentage error between theoretical BW CCS values and experimental values; Schematic representation of the shapes discussed with the CCS trendlines; Structure of the 15 initial geometries used in the C2-C16 dimer example; Structures of the lowest energy conformers with a CCS within 2% error obtained using M06-2X/6-31+G(d,p) for the monomeric ion; Structures of the lowest energy conformers with a CCS within 2% error obtained using M06-2X/6-31+G(d,p) and M06-2X/6-311++G(d,p) levels of theory for the dimeric ions; Structures of the eight lowest energy conformers optimized at the M06-2X/6-31+G(d,p) level of theory for C6, C9, C12 and C16 monomeric ions; Structures of the ten lowest energy conformers optimized at the M06-2X/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory for C4-C4, C6-C6, C10-C10, C14-C14 and C18-C18 dimers as well as C2-C16, C6-C12 and C9-C9 dimers.
Actions