Abstract
Deamidation of asparagine and glutamine residues occurs spontaneously, is influenced by pH, temperature, and incubation time, and can be accelerated by adjacent amino acid residues. Incubation conditions used for proteolytic digestion in bottom-up proteomic studies can induce significant deamidation that affect results, either knowingly or unknowingly. This has prompted studies into modifications to common trypsin digestion protocols to minimize chemical deamidation, including shorter incubation times and specific lysis buffers. Prior work suggested ammonium acetate at pH 6 to minimize chemical deamidation, but this buffer has compatibility issues with trypsin digestion and common assays (e.g., bicinchoninic acid assays). Here, we re-evaluated former comparisons of Tris-HCl, ammonium bicarbonate, and triethylammonium bicarbonate buffers for the amount of artificial, chemically induced deamidation generated in a standard bottom-up proteomics workflow, and we added an evaluation of three commonly used and biologically compatible buffers, HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid), EPPS, (3-[4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)piperazin-1-yl]propane-1-sulfonic acid), and PBS (phosphate buffered saline). Our findings show that HEPES exhibited the least amount of artificial deamidation and is a reasonable choice for general proteomic experiments, especially for studies considering N-glycosylation.
Supplementary materials
Title
Supporting Information
Description
Figure S1. Chemical structures, pKa values, and recommended pH ranges for buffers.
Figure S2. Total number of deamidated peptides from NIH/3T3 cells.
Figure S3. Percentage of peptides containing pyroglutamic acid.
Figure S4. Examples of the unmodified versions of peptides from Figure 3.
Actions