Surface state of NiOOH under oxidative conditions: Can dopants induce surface oxidation?

23 December 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Nickel oxyhydroxide (NiOOH), featuring redox-active NiIII, is a one of the best non-noble electro- oxidation catalyst in alkaline solution. However, NiOOH is only stable at potentials ≥ 1.5V vs RHE, with Ni(OH)2 being the stable reduced form at lower potentials. The potential of the phase transition from inactive Ni(OH)2 to active NiOOH can be tuned by doping. Lowering the potential for reaching the phase-transition is thought to be beneficial for lowering the overpotential of oxidation reactions catalysed by NiOOH. Here, we investigate which first row transition metals are most plausible for this purpose: First, the doped structure should be more stable than the phase-segregated system and second the potential for reaching the NiOOH-like phase should be lower compared to the pure Ni compound. Substitutional doping of NiOOH is found to be plausible for many dopants, but only V can be incorporated exothermically compared to their pure oxyhydroxides. Furthermore, dopants lead to a substantial lowering in the potential necessary to reach the phase transition. Since catalysis is more a surface than a bulk process, we then investigate the surface state of NiOOH and the impact of substitutional doping on it. To address this question, we apply grand-canonical density functional theory (GC-DFT) in order to explicitly account for the electrochemical potential. We find that the stoichiometric surface (50% hydrogen coverage) is the most stable one over a large range of relevant potentials at pH 14. Oxidizing the surface lowers the hydrogen coverage and occurs at about 1.7 V vs RHE, i.e.,∼0.2 V less positive compared to the potential of the phase transition. At a doping level of 25%, only V and Cr allow to stabilize NiIII at significantly lower potentials compared to pure NiOOH (down to 1.1 V vs RHE) in the bulk. Furthermore, vanadium, chromium and manganese might be suitable choices as these metal centers, which remain in the +III or +IV state at lower potentials compared to Ni, could also act as active sites in electro-oxidation reactions.

Keywords

GC-DFT
NiOOH
Surface State

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplementary information
Description
Additional Figures and Tables
Actions
Title
python scripts for Figures
Description
Python scripts generating the most relevant figures of the manuscript.
Actions

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.