Practical pathways to higher energy density LMFP battery cathodes

19 December 2024, Version 2
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

The design of new lithium-ion battery (LIB) cathode materials must balance many factors: performance, cost, manufacturability, safety, critical mineral usage and geopolitical constraints. Recently commercialised LiMnxFe1-xPO4 (LMFP) materials offer good energy density & stability, low material cost and excellent safety characteristics, avoiding the use of Co or Ni. Within this material set lies a wide variety of potential formulations (Mn/Fe ratio) exhibiting varied cathode properties and challenges. In this work, we assessed three commercially available LMFP materials with Mn content in the range 60 – 80 % in a full cell format, confirming the role of Mn/Fe ratio on specific capacity, energy density and electrochemical stability. High Mn content increased the average discharge voltage while maintaining specific discharge capacity, with 80 % Mn providing an 18 % boost to initial gravimetric energy density over LFP. However, worse kinetics and increased capacity fade rate resulted in the reduction and eventual elimination of this energy density advantage after 100 cycles. A blend cathode (LMFP and LiNi0.8Mn0.1Co0.1O2, NMC811) was also evaluated, exhibiting characteristics of both material types. An initial 23 % boost to energy density over LMFP alone was diluted following NMC-dominated degradation in early cycles, but enhanced capacity retention over NMC811 alone remained in long-term cycling. This work highlights the potential advantages of these newly commercialised materials, while identifying outstanding challenges to widespread adoption and exploitation.

Keywords

Li-ion Battery
Cathode
LMFP
NMC811
Energy Density

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.