Rationalizing the “Anomalous” Electrochemical Stark Shift of CO at Pt(111) Through Vibrational Spectroscopy and Density-Functional Theory Calculations

07 November 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

We employ infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy (IRRAS) and first-principles density-functional theory (DFT) to revisit the reported “anomalous” negative Stark shift of the CO stretch frequency at Pt(111) in aqueous electrolyte. Our comprehensive IRRAS measurements confirm the existence of a potential region with negative Stark shift around 0.5 V vs. the reversible hydrogen electrode, but only at a sufficiently high CO concentration in the electrolyte. As these are exactly the same conditions for the occurrence of a phase transition from a (2×2)-3CO to a (√19×√19)R23.4°-13CO adsorbate structure, we explicitly compute the Stark shift for these two phases using DFT. Neither phase exhibits a negative Stark shift, but the absolute stretch frequencies of the atop CO in the two structures are slightly shifted with respect to each other. Remeasuring IRRAS with high resolution indeed reveals a doublet character of the absorption band in the potential region corresponding to the negative Stark shift. Separate fits of the two components then yield positive Stark shifts in quantitative agreement with the calculated values. The “anomalous” negative Stark shift simply arises from effectively fitting one component to a doublet spectral feature in a potential range with phase coexistence at the surface.

Keywords

electrochemistry
platinum
density functional theory
IRRAS
adsorption
Stark shift
carbon monoxide
vibrational spectroscopy

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplementary Material
Description
Supplementary figures: potential vs. time profile in experiment; details of double-peak fitting; computed infrared intensities; and computed double peak spectrum
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.