Assessment of Basis Set Projection and Many-Body Expansion for Initial Guesses of Self-Consistent Field Calculations

29 October 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

In Self-Consistent Field (SCF) calculations, the choice of initial guess plays a key role in determining the time-to-solution by influencing the number of iterations required for convergence. However, focusing solely on reducing iterations may overlook the computational cost associated with improving the accuracy of initial guesses. This study critically evaluates the effectiveness of two initial guess methods—basis set projection (BSP) and many-body expansion (MBE)—as well as a newly developed hybrid approach on Hartree-Fock and hybrid Density Functional Theory (B3LYP and MN15) methods. Our assessment considers both the number of SCF iterations and the total computational wall-times. The results demonstrate that the non-SAD techniques BSP, MBE, and the hybrid method could significantly outperform the conventional superposition of atomic densities (SAD) technique. With these methods, reductions in total wall-time, including the time spent generating initial guesses, by up to 21.9%, 27.6% and 21.6% could be observed with HF, B3LYP and MN15, respectively, when tested on systems containing up to 14,386 basis functions. Furthermore, we also examine the influence of these initial guess schemes on difficult-to-converge metalloprotein and triplet electronic states.

Keywords

SCF
Initial Guess
DFT
Hartree-Fock
Convergence
SAD
Basis Set Projection
Many Body Expansion

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting Information: Assessment of Basis Set Projection and Many-Body Expansion for Initial Guesses of Self-Consistent Field Calculations
Description
Supplementary material
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.