Crash Testing Machine Learning Force Fields for Molecules, Materials, and Interfaces: Molecular Dynamics in the TEA Challenge 2023

27 September 2024, Version 1

Abstract

We present the second part of the rigorous evaluation of state-of-the-art machine learning force fields (MLFFs) within the TEA Challenge 2023. This study provides an in-depth analysis of the performance of MACE, SO3krates, sGDML, SOAP/GAP, and FCHL19* in modeling molecules, molecule-surface interfaces, and periodic materials. We compare observables obtained from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations using different MLFFs under identical conditions. Where applicable, density-functional theory (DFT) or experiment serves as a reference to reliably assess the performance of the machine learning models. In the absence of DFT benchmarks, we conduct a comparative analysis based on results from various MLFF architectures. Our findings indicate that at the current stage of MLFF development, the choice of the ML model is becoming less critical, as the resulting simulations are largely independent of the MLFF architecture. Instead, emphasis should be placed on developing complete, reliable, and representative training datasets. Nonetheless, long-range noncovalent interactions remain challenging for all MLFF models, necessitating special caution in simulations of physical systems where such interactions are prominent, such as molecule-surface interfaces. The findings presented here reflect the state of MLFF models as of October 2023.

Keywords

Machine Learning
Force Fields
Atomistic Simulations
Molecular Dynamics

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
SI: Crash Testing Machine Learning Force Fields for Molecules, Materials, and Interfaces: Molecular Dynamics in the TEA Challenge 2023
Description
The clustering procedure used in the preparation for the Ramachandran plots in the main article is presented in this SI. Further, tables for each of the Challenges I - IV present the way the MD simulations fail by providing case-by-case information for the types of broken bonds involved in the failure. Finally, the radial distribution functions for the MAPbI system of Challenge IV is shown at different temperatures, generated with MLFFs and a DFT-level reference.
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.