End-To-End Learning of Classical Interatomic Potentials for Benchmarking Anion Polarization Effects in Lithium Polymer Electrolytes

11 September 2024, Version 2
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Solid polymer electrolytes are an exciting solution for safe and stable solid lithium electrode battery systems but are hindered by low ionic conductivity and low lithium transference. All-atom molecular dynamics simulation has become an invaluable tool to probe lithium diffusion mechanisms and accelerate the discovery of promising polymer chemistries. Because of their low computational cost and despite their approximate nature, only classical interatomic potentials can access the time and length scales for appropriate statistics of polymer kinetics. Machine learning (ML) potentials trained end-to-end on ab initio data have proven more accurate but cannot be scaled to the necessary time- and length- scales yet. Historical approaches to parameterize classical force fields have been incremental, reliant on a manual combination of top-down and bottom-up fitting, and are often paywalled and hard to reproduce. We introduce a computational learning workflow to predict classical interatomic potential parameters using quantum mechanical computations as training data that combines the automation and end-to-end fitting of ML with traditional class 1 and class 2 functional forms. The fitting strategy produced potentials whose simulations improved the accuracy of lithium coordination environments, diffusivities, and conductivities relative to experimental approaches when compared to both naive and hand-tuned parameters for liquid and solid organic electrolyte systems. We show that chemistry-informed regularization is necessary to constrain predicted parameters in order to reproduce experimental solvation and kinetic properties. Finally, we explore the limitations of non-polarizable, fixed point-charge schemes in describing electrolyte anions and compare the effects of two alternative schemes to fit point-charge distributions. The two strategies result in distinct lithium coordination mechanisms and highlight that closest parity to DFT forces and energies does not correlate to correct trends with lithium salt concentration in kinetic and solvation properties for fixed-point-charge classical interatomic potentials.

Keywords

electrolyte
molecular dynamics
machine learning
polymer
energy storage
interatomic potential
classical interatomic potential

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting Information
Description
Additional training considerations, dihedral regularization conformation exploration, molecular dynamics simulation details, class 2 interatomic potential performance for different sets of geometries, class 2 diffusivities, all TFSI point charges, carbonate additional information and radial distribution functions.
Actions
Title
Liquid Carbonate Electrolyte Supporting Information
Description
Training, kinetic property, and solvation benchmarking results for AutoBADDIE-derived liquid carbonate interatomic potential parameters.
Actions

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.