Importance of Orbital Invariance in Quantifying Electron-Hole Separation and Exciton Size

19 August 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

A fundamental tenet of quantum mechanics is that properties should be independent of representation. In self-consistent field methods such as density functional theory, this manifests as a requirement that properties be invariant with respect to unitary transformations of the occupied molecular orbitals and (separately) the unoccupied molecular orbitals. Various ad hoc measures of excited-state charge separation that are commonly used to analyze time-dependent density-functional calculations violate this requirement, as they are based on incoherent averages of excitation amplitudes rather than averages over coherent superposition states. As a result, these metrics afford markedly different values in various common representations including canonical molecular orbitals, Boys-localized orbitals, and natural transition orbitals (NTOs). Numerical values of these charge-transfer metrics can be unstable with respect to basis-set expansion and may afford nonsensical values in the presence of extremely diffuse basis functions. In contrast, metrics based on well-defined expectation values are stable, representation-invariant, and physically interpretable. Although the NTO representation improves the stability of these ad hoc charge-transfer diagnostics, it remains the case that an incoherent average can only be connected to an expectation value in the absence of superposition. For the NTO representation to satisfy this condition, the particle and hole density matrices must each be dominated by a single eigenvector so that the transition density is well described a single pair of NTOs. Counterexamples are readily found where this is not the case.

Keywords

time-dependent density functional theory
charge transfer
excited states
molecular orbitals
quantum mechanics

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting Information
Description
Additional data tables and figures.
Actions
Title
coordinates
Description
Cartesian coordinates for all molecular structures.
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.