Asymmetric pathways for lithium extraction and recovery based on the two-phase equilibrium of layered oxides

30 July 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Electrochemical intercalation offers a promising platform for Li+ extraction. However, only limited types of electrode materials have been investigated. The challenge to broaden and tailor materials for electrochemical intercalation-based Li+ extraction lies in the lack of understanding of material’s response upon co-intercalation of multiple ions, therefore, paired process design to enable reversible Li+ extraction and recovery. Here, we showcase the design of asymmetric ion pathways for Li+ extraction and recovery for host material with complex Li+ and Na+ interaction using layered cobalt oxide as a model material, which could enable the large class of layered oxides for Li+ extraction. The two-phase equilibrium of Na0.48CoO2 and Li0.94CoO2 governs record high Li+ selectivity when a high depth of intercalation is achieved (low vacancy level). We show that the relative rate between ion exchange and intercalation is critical to determine the ion pathways. The relationship can be quantitatively compared using the average pseudo ion exchange rate (CpseudoIX) and the intercalation rate (Cinter). The ion pathways at the three regimes with CpseudoIX > Cinter, CpseudoIX ~ Cinter, and CpseudoIX < Cinter are constructed. By selecting the optimized ion pathway and particle size, we demonstrated 9.7×104 Li+ selectivity with 99% purity Li+ recovery from an initial 1:1000 Li: Na molar ratio solution using 115 mAh/g capacity with good reversibility.

Keywords

Ion exchange
Lithium extraction
In situ X-ray diffraction

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplementary Information
Description
This document includes 42 supplementary figures, 5 notes, 3 tables, and 9 references.
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.