U.S. ambient air monitoring network has inadequate coverage under new PM2.5 standard

24 July 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

The Clean Air Act (CAA) in the United States relies heavily on regulatory monitoring networks, yet monitoring sites are sparsely located, especially among historically disadvantaged communities. For ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5), we compare the air quality monitoring data with spatially complete concentrations derived from empirical models to quantify the gaps of existing U.S. monitoring networks in capturing concentration hotspots and exposure disparities. Recently, the U.S. Environmental Protection agency adopted a more stringent annual-average air quality standard for PM2.5 (9 µg/m3). Here, we demonstrate that 44% of urban areas exceeding this new standard – encompassing ~ 20 million people – would remain undetected because of gaps in the current PM2.5 monitoring network. Crucially, we find that “uncaptured” hotspots, which contain 2.8 million people in census tracts that are misclassified as in attainment of the new PM2.5 standard, have substantially higher percentages of minority populations (i.e., people of color, disadvantaged communities, and low-income populations) compared to the overall US population. To address these gaps, we highlight 10 priority locations that could reduce the population in the uncaptured hotspots by 67%. Overall, our findings highlight the urgent need to address gaps in the existing monitoring network.

Keywords

Air pollution
Environmental policy
Air quality monitoring
Environmental justice
Clean Air Act
NAAQS

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting information: U.S. ambient air monitoring network has inadequate coverage under new PM2.5 standard
Description
This supporting information file contains the following: 1. Supporting text; 2. SI references; 3. Tables S1 - S3; 4. Figures S1 - S21
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.