Harnessing Physics-inspired Machine Learning to Design Nanocluster Catalysts for Dehydrogenating Liquid Organic Hydrogen Carriers

09 July 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Using liquid organic hydrogen carriers for the trans-oceanic shipment of hydrogen requires selective and low-cost dehydrogenation catalysts. Machine learning methods can accelerate the discovery of these catalysts. The state-of-the-art machine learning methods are however limited by challenges associated with building predictive models for large cyclic intermediates that adsorb and react on low-symmetry active sites. Focusing on methyl cyclohexane dehydrogenation to toluene, an industrially relevant hydrogen carrier, we introduce a machine learning approach to accelerate the design of selective and cost-effective catalysts. Using inputs to a gaussian process regression model that are inspired by physical theories of chemisorption, we predict the adsorption energies of large hydrocarbon intermediates that are encountered during methyl cyclohexane dehydrogenation. Across bimetallic active sites of nanoclusters having varied shapes and compositions, our model yields mean absolute errors of 0.11 – 0.25 eV on test sets and utilizes under 100 datapoints per reaction intermediate. This model is integrated with a microkinetic model to identify promising catalysts. Modifying Pt nanoclusters with IB, IIB, and post-transition elements like Cu and Sn increases dehydrogenation rates, reduces unselective reactions, and lowers Pt utilization, consistent with prior experiments. This work presents a scalable, and efficient framework for designing bimetallic catalysts for dehydrogenating hydrogen carriers.

Keywords

Catalyst screening
Liquid organic hydrogen carrier
Bimetallic nanocluster
Physics-inspired machine learning

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplementary Information
Description
This document includes computational details of DFT calculation and microkinetic modelling, fingerprint calculation of the GPR model, the testing of the GPR model, the coverage effect correction, and the validation of the microkinetic simulation.
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.