Validation of the identification reliability of known and assumed UDMH transformation products using gas chromatographic retention indices and machine learning

25 April 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Thirty two commercially available standards were used to determine chromatographic retention indices (RIs) for three different stationary phases. The selected compounds were nitrogen-containing heterocycles and amides, which are unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine (UDMH) transformation products or its assumed transformation products. UDMH is a highly toxic compound widely used in the space industry, that forms a number of different compounds in the environment. Well-known transformation products may exceed UDMH itself in their toxicity, but most of the products are poorly investigated, while posing a huge environmental threat. Experimental RIs for the stationary phases, RIs from the NIST database, and predicted RIs are presented in this paper. It is shown that there are virtually no RIs for UDMH transformation products in the NIST database. In addition, even among those compounds for which RIs were known, inconsistencies were identified. Adding RIs to the database and eliminating erroneous data would allow for more reliable identification when standards are not available. The discrepancies identified between experimental RI values and predicted values will allow for adjustments to the machine learning models that are used for prediction. Previously proposed compounds as possible transformation products without the use of standards and NMR method were confirmed.

Keywords

Retention index
unsymmetrical dimethylhydrazine
identification
retention index prediction

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplementary Materials
Description
Examples of the GC-MS chromatograms of the mixture of target analytes with alkanes
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.