Does Machine Learning Learn the Physics for Pose Ranking of Fragment-Sized Ligands? A Comparison between Machine Learning and Physics-based Methods

24 May 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

In fragment-based drug discovery using in silico methods, predicting the binding pose is a crucial step to ensure the accurate prediction of binding affinities. Recent studies have focused on the challenges of docking fragments compared to drug-like molecules, with findings suggesting that more sophisticated scoring functions can improve the accuracy of identifying correct binding poses. In this work, we conducted extensive ABFEP (Alchemical Binding Free Energy Perturbation) calculations on a fragment benchmarking dataset to evaluate the accuracy of ABFEP in ranking binding poses of fragments and compared ABFEP rescoring with Vina and two machine learning (ML)-based scoring functions. Indeed, ABFEP, which has a theoretically more rigorous scoring function, significantly outperforms Vina. In-depth comparison between ML-based scoring functions and ABFEP shows that ML-based scoring functions behave similarly to ABFEP on the prediction accuracy and failed cases, indicating that ML is capable of increasing the prediction accuracy over traditional scoring functions through learning the underlying physics rather than memorizing the coordinates in the training data.

Keywords

ABFEP
Machine Learning
binding pose prediction
scoring function

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Does Machine Learning Learn the Physics for Pose Ranking of Fragment-Sized Ligands? A Comparison between Machine Learning and Physics-based Methods
Description
The supporting information contains a comparison of docking results (Table S1), a summary of ABFEP results (Table S2) and three figures (Figure S1, S2, S3) illustrating possible reasons related to the failure of ABFEP calculations.
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.