Meta-Analysis of Molecular Design Strategies for Non-Fullerene Acceptor Based Organic Solar Cell Materials

12 April 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

The design of high-performing OSC materials is an active field of research. Many review articles summarize certain subclasses of NFAs, however, no broad overall analysis has been performed on the photovoltaic impact of chemical modifications made. This meta-analysis investigates various molecular design strategies for NFAs and donors and their effects on OSC device performance. Using a new dataset containing 1975 NFA/donor pairs, we performed matched-pair analysis on many design strategies to try to discern whether it has a significant impact on PCE. For the NFA, the class and size of the NFA, heteroatom substitution, types of rings and their sequence in the fused core, side chains, halogenation of terminal groups, and the presence of a pi-bridge are examined. For the donor polymers, the monomer identities, the types of side chains, and the halogenation of the polymer are examined. Some molecular design strategies that were found to significantly improve the PCE include branched instead of linear side chains, fused cores containing 8 rings, fused NFAs containing pyran, pyrrole, and selenophene, fused cores containing an odd number of thiophenes, the presence of pi-bridge units, halogenating the NFA and donor, incorporation of alkylsilyl chains instead of alkyl chains in donor polymers, as well as multiple others.

Keywords

organic solar cells
organic photovoltaics
non-fullerene acceptors
materials design
matched-pair analysis
meta-analysis
meta-review

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting Information
Description
Individual matched pair analyses, examples of core and terminal groups, and analysis of sequence frequencies for fused NFAs
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.