How do spin-scaled double hybrids designed for excitation energies perform for noncovalent excited-state interactions? An investigation on aromatic excimer models

30 January 2024, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Time-dependent double hybrids with spin-component or spin-opposite scaling to their second-order pertur- bative correlation correction have demonstrated competitive robustness in the computation of electronic excitation energies. Some of the most robust are those recently published by our group [M. Casanova-Páez, L. Goerigk, J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2021, 20, 5165]. So far, their implementation has not allowed correctly calculating their ground-state total energies. Herein, we define their correct spin-scaled ground-state energy expressions which enables us to test our methods on the noncovalent excited-state interaction energies of four aromatic excimers. A range of 22 double hybrids with and without spin scaling are compared to the reasonably accurate wavefunction reference from our previous work [A. C. Hancock, L. Goerigk, RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 35964]. The impact of spin scaling is highly dependent on the underlying functional expression, however, the smallest overall errors belong to spin-scaled functionals with range separation: SCS- and SOS-ωPBEPP86, and SCS-RSX-QIDH. We additionally determine parameters for DFT-D3(BJ)/D4 ground-state dispersion corrections of these functionals, which reduce errors in most cases. We highlight the importance of dispersion corrections for even the most robust TD-DFT methods and the inability of ground-state based corrections to completely capture dispersion effects for excited-state interaction energies.

Keywords

time-dependent density functional theory
double hybrids
time-dependent double hybrids
excited states
excimers
noncovalent interaction in excited states
noncovalent interactions
benchmarking
spin-opposite scaling
spin-component scaling

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting Information
Description
Supporting Information with extra results
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.