Assessment of embedding schemes in a hybrid machine learning/classical potentials (ML/MM) scheme

22 November 2023, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Machine Learning (ML) methods have reached high accuracy levels for the prediction of in vacuo molecular properties. However, the simulation of large systems through solely ML methods (like those based on neural network potentials) is still a challenge. In this context, one of the most promising frameworks for integrating ML schemes in the simulation of complex molecular systems are the so-called ML/MM methods. These multiscale approaches combine ML methods with classical forcefields (MM), in the same spirit as the succesful hybrid quantum mechanics-molecular mechanics methods (QM/MM). The key issue for such ML/MM methods is the adequate description of the coupling between the region of the system described by ML and the region described at the MM level. In the context of QM/MM schemes, the main ingredient of the interaction is electrostatic, and the state of the art is the so called electrostatic-embedding. In this study, we analyze the quality of simpler mechanical embedding-based approaches, specifically focusing on their application within a ML/MM framework utilizing atomic partial charges derived in vacuo. Taking as reference electrostatic embedding calculations performed at a QM(DFT)/MM level, we explore different atomic charges schemes, as well as a polarization correction computed using atomic polarizabilites. Our benchmark data set comprises a set of about 80k small organic structures from the ANI-1x database, solvated in water. The results suggest that the MBIS atomic charges yield the best agreement with the reference coupling energy. Remarkable enhancements are achieved by including a simple polarization correction.

Keywords

QM/MM
MBIS
Polarization

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Suplementary material
Description
Figure S1: Decision tree implemented for assigning atom types. Figure S2: Correlartion between E ME+P QM/MM using MBIS charges cumputed at the ωb97x/def2-TZVPP or PBE/DZVP levels of theory compared to E EE QM/MM using PBE/DZVP. Figure S3: Addition of the estimation of the distortion energy for element-based atomic polarizabilities
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.