Comparison of Machine-Learning and Classical Force Fields in Simulating the Solvation of Small Organic Molecules in Acetonitrile

31 October 2023, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Machine learning force fields (MLFFs) have emerged as a new method for molecular simulation that combines the accuracy of ab initio approaches with the computational efficiency of classical force fields. However, the performance of MLFFs in describing the solvation configuration has yet to be explored. Here, we compare and contrast the performance of ANI-1ccx MLFF, the GAFF classical force field, and the ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) in simulating nine organic solutes in acetonitrile solvents. We examine the solvent-solute interaction described by these methods from four aspects: the solute conformation landscape, the solvation shell structure, the structure and dynamics of the O-H⋯N hydrogen bond, and the dynamics of the first solvation shell. For solute conformation description, ANI-1ccx and GAFF both yield minima that agree with density functional theory optimization for rigid solutes. However, their results diverge for flexible solutes. For solvation shell structure description, ANI-1ccx agrees better with AIMD on the location of the first solvent shell than GAFF does. For the description of the O-H⋯N hydrogen bond formed between acetonitrile and the solute, ANI-1ccx generates stronger hydrogen bonds with shorter bond lengths, wider bond angles, and longer hydrogen bond lifetimes, agreeing better with DFT-optimized structure. ANI-1ccx also describes a more frequent exchange of acetonitrile molecules in and out of the first solvation shell than GAFF. Our study demonstrates the potential benefits of utilizing MLFF for simulating solution-phase dynamics and generating solvation configurations.

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.