Assessing the progress of the performance of continuous emission monitoring solutions under single-blind controlled testing protocol

16 October 2023, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Recent regulatory spotlight on continuous emissions monitoring (CEM) and the rapid development of CEM solutions has demanded the characterization of solutions performance through regular, rigorous testing using consensus test protocols. This study is the second known implementation of such protocol involving single-blind controlled testing of 10 CEM solutions. Controlled releases of rates (6 to 7100) g CH4/h over durations (0.4 to 10.2) hours under wind speed range of (0.7 to 9.9) m/s were conducted for 11 weeks. Results showed that 4 solutions achieved minimum detection limits (MDLs) within tested emission rate range with all 4 solutions having both the lowest MDLs (3.7 [3.0, 5.2] kg CH4/h to 6.1 [3.7, 17.1] kg 11 CH4/h) and FP rates (9.2% to 15.4%) indicating efforts at balancing low sensitivity with low FP rate. Quantification results showed wide individual estimate uncertainties with emissions underestimation and overestimation by factors up to > 15 and 97 respectively. Three solutions had > 80% of their estimates within a factor of 3 of actual rates for controlled release in the ranges of (0.1 – 1] kg CH4/h and >1 kg CH4/h respectively. Relative to the study by Bell et al., current solutions performance, as a group, generally improved majorly due to solutions from the study by Bell et al. that retested. This result highlights the importance of regular, quality testing to the advancement of CEM solutions for effective emissions mitigation.

Keywords

Methane
emissions mitigation
detection limit
emissions quantification
source attribution
natural gas

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supporting Information
Description
The zipped file contains the supporting document (PDF) along with some folders. Each folder contains the blinded performance report and data of each continuous emissions monitoring technology that participated in the study. In detail, the folder contains a report "CMReport" (PDF), controlled release data file "testCenterControlledReleases" (csv), data of paired controlled release with detection reports "classifiedData" (csv), and data column header description "OutputHeaderDescriptions" (csv).
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.