Open-shell Magnetic States in Alternant and Non-alternant Nanographenes: Conceptions and Misconceptions

30 August 2023, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

In contrast to alternant nanographenes (NGRs), in non-alternant NGRs no “sublattice structure” can be defined associated with significant conceptual and computational simplifications. This leads to some fundamental differences between the two. We uncover here the broken electron-hole symmetry in non-alternant NGRs as one fundamental difference closely related to distorted Dirac points (cones) and their diradical open-shell character. We also show by higher level calculations beyond common DFT that the alternant series of peri-acenes (bisanthene, peri-tetracene, peri-pentacene, … etc.), contrary to opposite reports in the literature, have clearly closed singlet ground states, in contrast to their non-alternant isomers based on Stone-Wales (SW) defects. This is experimentally supported by sub-molecularly resolved STM images. The misconceptions in the literature are due to insufficient correlation. For non-alternant NGRs/GNRs with antiaromatic rings the driving force for open-shell states and distorted Dirac points (involving localized electrons and delocalized holes) is antiaromaticity, which is a sufficient but not always necessary condition. This is in juxtaposition to the aromaticity of the alternant isomers with closed shell states. Thus, in both cases sublattice problems lead to open shell magnetic states; ferromagnetic in cases of sublattice imbalance (e.g. triangulenes), antiferromagnetic for non-sublattice cases (e.g. SW3x2, SW4x2), and non-magnetic (diamagnetic) for balanced sublattices (e.g. AGNRs). Obviously, similar results are expected for larger NGRs/GNRs obtained by concatenation of such SW-motifs.

Keywords

Alternant and Non-alternant hydrocarbons
Atomically precise AGNRs
Aromaticity-Antiaromaticity
Stone-Wales defects
Spin-polarized states

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Conceptions and Misconceptions for open shell magnetic states in NGRs and GNRs
Description
The most general conclusion we have reached can be condensed as follows: in both cases sublattice problems are responsible for open shell magnetic states. For the alternant GNRs sublattice imbalance leads to ferromagnetic states (e.g. triangulenes). For non-benzenoid GNRs with complete lack of sublattice structure we get antiferromagnetic states (e.g. SW3x2, SW4x2); and finally, for well-balanced sublattices the result is closed shell non-magnetic (diamagnetic) states (e.g. AGNRs).
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.