Using AlphaFold and Experimental Structures for the Prediction of the Structure and Binding Affinities of GPCR Complexes via In-duced Fit Docking and Free Energy Perturbation

31 July 2023, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Free energy perturbation (FEP) remains an indispensable method for computationally assaying prospective compounds in advance of synthesis. But before FEP can be deployed prospectively, it must demonstrate retrospective recapitulation of known experimental data where the subtle details of the atomic ligand-receptor model are consequential. An open question is whether AlphaFold models can serve as useful initial models for FEP in the regime where there exists a congeneric series of known chemical matter but where no experimental structures are available either of the target or of close homologues. As AlphaFold structures are provided without a ligand bound, we employ induced-fit docking to refine the AlphaFold models in the presence of one or more congeneric ligands. In this work, we first validate the performance of our latest induced-fit docking technology, IFD-MD on a retrospective set of public experimental GPCR structures with 95% of crossdocks produc-ing a pose with a ligand RMSD ≤ 2.5 Å in the top 2 predictions. We then apply IFD-MD and FEP on AlphaFold models of the somatostatin receptor family of GPCRs. We use AlphaFold models produced prior to the availability of any experi-mental structure from within this family. We arrive at FEP-validated models for SSTR2, SSTR4, and SSTR5, with RMSE around 1 kcal/mol and explore the challenges of model validation under scenarios of limited ligand-data, ample ligand data, and categorical data.

Keywords

AlphaFold
Free Energy Perturbation
Induced Fit Docking

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Supplemental Material
Description
Detailed results for the retrospective GPCR crossdocks using IFD-MD or GlideSP, pKa values and the associated ∆G correc-tions at pH 7.4 used for the SSTR4 ligand dataset, FEP results on AlphaFold or experimentally derived SSTR2 models, SSTR4 FEP results when no pKa correction is applied, com-parison of the best performing SSTR4 models with and with-out applying pKa corrections
Actions
Title
Coordinates of the final SSTR4 model
Description
PDB Coordinates of the final SSTR4 model containing ligand 27 from WO2016075239Al
Actions
Title
Coordinates of the final SSTR2 model
Description
PDB Coordinates of the final SSTR2 model containing ligand 5o from Contour-Galcera et. al 2005
Actions
Title
Coordinates of the final SSTR5 model
Description
PDB Coordinates of the final SSTR5 model containing ligand 1-77 from WO2021030262A1
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.