EnzyHTP Computational Directed Evolution with Adaptive Resource Allocation

20 June 2023, Version 2
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Directed evolution facilitates enzyme engineering via iterative rounds of mutagenesis. Despite the wide applications of high-throughput screening, building “smart libraries” to effectively identify beneficial variants remains a major challenge in the community. Here, we developed a new computational directed evolution protocol based on EnzyHTP, a software we have previously reported to automate enzyme modeling. To enhance the throughput efficiency, we implemented an adaptive resource allocation strategy that dynamically allocates different types of computing resources (e.g., GPU/CPU) based on the specific need of an enzyme modeling sub-task in the workflow. We implemented the strategy as a Python library and tested the library using fluoroacetate dehalogenase as a model enzyme. The results show that comparing to fixed resource allocation where both CPU and GPU are on-call for use during the entire workflow, applying adaptive resource allocation can save 87% CPU hours and 14% GPU hours. Furthermore, we constructed a computational directed evolution protocol under the framework of adaptive resource allocation. The workflow was tested against two rounds of mutational screening in the directed evolution experiments of Kemp eliminase with a total of 184 mutants. Using folding stability and electrostatic stabilization energy as computational readout, we reproduced three out of the four experimentally-observed target variants. Enabled by the workflow, the entire computation task (i.e., 18.4 μs MD and 18,400 QM single point calculations) completes in three days of wall clock time using ~30 GPUs and ~1000 CPUs.

Keywords

resource allocation
high-throughput simulation
Python
computational directed evolution
EnzyHTP

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
SI PDF document
Description
Example code of ARMer API; Structure of FAcD K83D mutant; Structure of the active site cluster; Choice of parallel strategy; Discrepancy of expected speed up and actual speed up from ARMer parallelization
Actions
Title
SI zip
Description
Input files for the fixed/adaptive resource allocation test: input structure; workflow python script; job submission script of the workflow script
Actions

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.