The Role of Emissions Size Distribution on the Efficacy of New Technologies to Reduce Methane Emissions from the Oil and Gas Sector

23 May 2023, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Methane emissions from oil and gas operations exhibit skewed distributions. New technologies such as aerial-based leak detection surveys promise cost-effective detection of large emitters. Recent policies such as the proposed US Environmental Protection Agency methane rule that allows the use of new technologies as part of conventional leak detection and repair (LDAR) require demonstration of equivalence with existing optical gas imaging (OGI)-based LDAR programs. In this work, we illustrate the impact of emission size distribution on the equivalency between OGI-based LDAR programs and that of alternative LDAR programs that use site-wide surveys. We find that emission size distribution compiled from aerial measurements across four oil and gas basins include significantly more emitters in the 1 – 10 kg/h and an order of magnitude lower average emission rate for large emitters compared to the emissions distribution in the EPA methane rule. As a result, equivalence between OGI-based surveys and site-wide screening may be achieved at lower site-wide survey frequencies when using technologies with detection threshold below 10 kg/h, compared to the EPA methane rule. However, equivalency cannot be achieved for site-wide screening with a detection threshold of 30 kg/h at any survey frequency because most emitters across most US oil and gas basins exhibit emission rates below 30 kg/h. We find that equivalence is a complex trade-off between the choice of technologies, design of hybrid LDAR programs, and survey frequency that can have more than one unique solution set.

Keywords

Methane Emissions
Equivalence
FEAST
EPA Methane Rule
Oil and Gas

Supplementary weblinks

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.