B12 and F430 Models: Metal- versus Ligand-Centered Redox in Cobalt and Nickel Tetradehydrocorrin Derivatives

20 February 2023, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

DFT calculations with the well-tested OLYP and B3LYP* exchange-correlation functionals (along with D3 dispersion corrections and all-electron ZORA STO-TZ2P basis sets) and careful use of group theory have led to significant insights into the question of metal- versus ligand-centered redox in Co and Ni B,C-tetradehydrocorrin complexes. For the cationic complexes, both metals occur in their low-spin M(II) forms. In contrast, the charge-neutral states vary for the two metals: while the Co(I) and CoII-TDCdot2minus state are comparable in energy for cobalt, a low-spin NiII-TDCdot2minus state is clearly preferred for nickel. The latter behavior stands in sharp contrast to other corrinoids that reportedly stabilize a Ni(I) center.

Keywords

corrin
corrinoid
B12
F430
porphyrin
hydroporphyrin

Supplementary materials

Title
Description
Actions
Title
Optimized Cartesian coordinates
Description
Optimized Cartesian coordinates
Actions

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.