Promoter-poison partnership protects platinum performance in coked cluster catalysts

13 October 2022, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.


Deactivation via coking due to a lack of selectivity is a persistent problem for the longevity of Pt-based dehydrogenation catalysts. Ge as a promoter improves the exper- imental selectivity and stability of subnano Pt clusters. The origin of this improvement is self-limiting coking, to form a Pt4GeC2 cluster which is more stable and selective than the bare Pt4Ge cluster. In this paper we compare the dehydrogenation abilities of Pt4 and Pt4C2 with and Pt4Ge and Pt4GeC2 with DFT calculations in order to explore the origin of self-limiting coking in the presence of Ge. The unique stability of Pt4GeC2 is attributed to electron donation from Ge to the C2 atoms. This prevents the coke from drawing electrons from the Pt, which is the origin of deactivation via coking. Thus, we identify an electronic mechanism for coke deactivation and then use an electronically driven doping strategy to improve catalyst longevity. This differs from the common perception of coke deactivating via steric blocking of active sites.Furthermore, Pt4C2 and Pt4GeC2 show differences in kinetic accessibility of different isomers, which brings us into a new paradigm of sub-ensembles of isomers, where the dominant active sites are determined by kinetic stability under reaction conditions, rather than Boltzmann populations.


catalyst deactivation
deactivation prevention
coke formation
catalyst doping

Supplementary materials

Supplementary Information: Promoter-poison partnership protects platinum performance in coked cluster catalysts
Computed ensembles for Pt4, Pt4C2, Pt4Ge, and Pt4GeC2 both bare and with adsorbed C2H6, C2H4, and C2H2. MO analysis of Pt4C2 vs. Pt4GeC2. Structures corresponding with C-H activation and C-C cracking NEBs. Comparison between C-H and C-C breaking barriers.


Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.