Temperature field evolution and thermal-mechanical interaction induced damage in drilling of thermoplastic CF/PEKK – A comparative study with thermoset CF/epoxy

09 August 2022, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.


Although new generation carbon fibre reinforced thermoplastic (CFRTP) such as carbon fibre reinforced polyetherketoneketone (CF/PEKK) is a promising sustainable alternative to the conventional thermoset CFRP, there is a lack of literature regarding its machining performance. This is the first study unveiling the hole wall and chip temperature evolution during drilling of thermoplastic CF/PEKK composite and the resulting material damages have been studied in detail. Through comparative study with CF/epoxy, the disparate drilling performance of the two composites has been uncovered, and the results were found to be closely related to the materials’ thermal/mechanical properties. Specifically, CF/PEKK produces continuous chips due to its excellent ductility and thermal sensitivity, whereas CF/epoxy produces segmented chips due to its brittle nature. CF/PEKK generates up to 40 N (50.5%) higher thrust force, 87.6 ℃ (98.9%) higher hole wall temperature and 61.1 ℃ (48.8 %) higher chip temperature than that of CF/epoxy. This has been correlated to the longer tool-chip contact length of CF/PEKK and its unique chip morphology. Despite the greater thrust force/temperature generation, CF/PEKK shows 55.7% lower delamination damage than CF/epoxy, and this is owning to its excellent interlaminar toughness. This study establishes a more in-depth understanding into the drilling performance of thermoplastic CF/PEKK and thermoset CF/epoxy and also provides guidance on the high performance manufacturing of next generation CFRPs.




Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.