Colloid filtration theories for fibrous bed coalescer design

09 August 2022, Version 1
This content is a preprint and has not undergone peer review at the time of posting.

Abstract

Fibrous bed coalescers are used in a wide range of applications, from food and soap processing to crude oil and fuel processing, yet there is no formal methodology to size coalescers. The closest form of a design equation comes from Lee and Liu’s (LL) 1980 colloid filtration theory, which considers inertial impaction as a method of drop capture. This work compares the LL framework to two additional colloid filtration theories. The first one is Rajagopalan and Tien’s (RT) 1976 theory, which considers inertial impaction and the detachment of a captured drop due to shear conditions. The second theory is a modified form of the RT framework that includes the coalescence probability (RTCP) between captured drops and drops in the incoming flow. For pad coalescers, the LL, RT, and RTCP theories were compared in terms of the predicted bed length for various combinations of superficial velocities (q) and bed porosities (ε_o). In the typical design range for “q” (0.6 - 3 cm/s), the three frameworks produce similar packed bed lengths. However, only RTCP can be used for high and low “q” values. The RTCP framework was also the only one capable of reproducing the recommended industrial practice for the design of cartridge coalescers. The RTCP framework was also used in a case study for the dewatering of diluted bitumen froth. A fibrous bed coalescer was sized to remove emulsified water from diluted bitumen extracted from the oil sands in the Canadian Athabasca region. The manufacturer-recommended “q” range of 0.6 - 3 cm/s was the most reasonable because higher “q” values produced larger pressure drops in the coalescer and a substantial increase in the size of the gravity separator.

Keywords

emulsions
separation
design
bitumen
coalescer

Comments

Comments are not moderated before they are posted, but they can be removed by the site moderators if they are found to be in contravention of our Commenting Policy [opens in a new tab] - please read this policy before you post. Comments should be used for scholarly discussion of the content in question. You can find more information about how to use the commenting feature here [opens in a new tab] .
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy [opens in a new tab] and Terms of Service [opens in a new tab] apply.